<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Village</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.moviecomment.com/317/the-village/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.moviecomment.com/317/the-village</link>
	<description>Movie Reviews And Comments</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Dec 2009 21:26:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Player</title>
		<link>http://www.moviecomment.com/317/the-village/comment-page-1#comment-1221</link>
		<dc:creator>Player</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 15:54:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moviecomment.com/?p=317#comment-1221</guid>
		<description>I finally got a chance to watch this film on DVD, and I&#039;d have to say that The Village is not a bad film, in fact it is rather entertaining as a romance. As a thriller or as a scary movie, yeah, it fails even before it starts. I kind of want to compare it to Cold Mountain in which an unlikely romance blossoms, but somehow I think The Village pulls it off better than Nicole Kidman and Jude Law.

The problem with The Village is that it is trying to be something it is not, mainly a scare-me thriller. Perhaps it is not so much that the film is bad as much as its audience is expecting something else. As a reader of 18 and 19 Century novels, this movie feels right, both in its look and in its performances. The soundtrack is subtle and compliments well the characters.

What is wrong is that The Village, never frightens you and even when it does, the suspension of disbelief is just way too out there for most of us to jump in whole heartedly. The scary woods is deader than skull bones, yet these people live off the land, there has to be animals right? Where&#039;s your occasional squirrel, or Bambi?

I would have to say that I liked this picture better than Signs, even though I thought Signs had better moments. The problem for me is that I hated the ending in Signs and in this movie the ending is perhaps not bad, but definitely the whole center of this movie should have been the romance and not the scary elements.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I finally got a chance to watch this film on DVD, and I&#8217;d have to say that The Village is not a bad film, in fact it is rather entertaining as a romance. As a thriller or as a scary movie, yeah, it fails even before it starts. I kind of want to compare it to Cold Mountain in which an unlikely romance blossoms, but somehow I think The Village pulls it off better than Nicole Kidman and Jude Law.</p>
<p>The problem with The Village is that it is trying to be something it is not, mainly a scare-me thriller. Perhaps it is not so much that the film is bad as much as its audience is expecting something else. As a reader of 18 and 19 Century novels, this movie feels right, both in its look and in its performances. The soundtrack is subtle and compliments well the characters.</p>
<p>What is wrong is that The Village, never frightens you and even when it does, the suspension of disbelief is just way too out there for most of us to jump in whole heartedly. The scary woods is deader than skull bones, yet these people live off the land, there has to be animals right? Where&#8217;s your occasional squirrel, or Bambi?</p>
<p>I would have to say that I liked this picture better than Signs, even though I thought Signs had better moments. The problem for me is that I hated the ending in Signs and in this movie the ending is perhaps not bad, but definitely the whole center of this movie should have been the romance and not the scary elements.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

